New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:06 pm
New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
Getting ready to purchase a new primary Win 2012 R2 server (E5 CPU, 16 GB RAM) that will host Medisoft Network Pro v19. It will also be used to host Quickbooks Enterprise and manage file/print share tasks. The old server (an aging Dell R320) is configured for RAID 1 for the OS and RAID 5 for document data.
Any problems with doing RAID 5 for both the OS and file data on the new one? There would be about 5 users hitting both the billing module and Office Hours, with another 10 hitting OH only. I'm trying to optimize the number of disks in the new system, but don't want to perceptibly impact performance.
Also, I'm thinking this would be a good opportunity to shift the office to ESXi. Any thoughts on performance hosting Medisoft in a Win VM on ESXi?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks.
- Gavin Walker
- Posts: 4625
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:11 pm
- Location: Springfield, MO
- Contact:
Re: New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
Walker Tek Solutions, LLC
417-890-6777 x0
fax: 417-763-6386
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:06 pm
Re: New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
- Gavin Walker
- Posts: 4625
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:11 pm
- Location: Springfield, MO
- Contact:
Re: New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
RAID-1 - requires at least 2 drives and all the drives are mirror copies of each other. So, if you have 3 drives configured RAID-1, then you have the capacity of 1 drive, but 3 exact copies of it - pretty safe. Writing will be the time it takes to write info to all 3 drives, but reads can go to whichever of the 3 drives will be ready first.
RAID-5 - requires at least 3 drives. Info is stripped across all the drives with parity info written to one of the drives. So if you have 4 drives, you will have the capacity of 3 of the drives. This is a nice trade-off of drive capacity versus hardware failure protection. There is some CPU time to calculate the parity information, but this is usually handled by the RAID card. Also, the capacity of the RAID-5 will be larger than the drives you are using to make it with, so that can be a nice benefit. Writing will be a little slower because info must be stripped across all drives and you have to write the parity, but it won't be as slow as RAID-1. Reading will be a little faster, because all the drives are working together, but RAID 1 will be a little faster on the reading.
If you are looking at it from a pure performance criteria, RAID-1 is going to be faster because Medisoft reads about 10x more than it writes. You might also look at doing RAID-10 which is kind of a nice medium between RAID-1 and RAID-5.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:06 pm
Re: New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
Thanks again.
- Gavin Walker
- Posts: 4625
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:11 pm
- Location: Springfield, MO
- Contact:
Re: New Server Storage Array Reccomendations...
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 10:06 pm